juskom95
10-27-2016, 01:16 PM
The two decided by what Munch called “a gentleman’s agreement” to swap their votes. Friday would vote for the Green Party candidate in Texas and Munch would check the box next to Clinton’s name in Colorado.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/10/27/voting-3rd-party-some-clinton-backers-want-swap-votes-you/92729736/
Stupid, and idiotic idea, but something occurred to me.
It is a 'gentlemen's agreement' not a binding contract or even anything similar. Could we get individuals to go on there, promise a vote for Clinton so that the other person votes 'third party' and vote for Trump anyway? It might not be ethical, but I think ethics are out of the window in this election.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/10/27/voting-3rd-party-some-clinton-backers-want-swap-votes-you/92729736/
Stupid, and idiotic idea, but something occurred to me.
It is a 'gentlemen's agreement' not a binding contract or even anything similar. Could we get individuals to go on there, promise a vote for Clinton so that the other person votes 'third party' and vote for Trump anyway? It might not be ethical, but I think ethics are out of the window in this election.