Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Looks Like the B-tch is advocating open civil war is Crazy Joe doesn't win.

  1. #11
    VIP Member! BucketBack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Great Lake State
    Posts
    21,965

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    20,042
    Thanked 33,103 Times in 14,729 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    White guy shot dead around Portland gas station during the dark hours
    Keep Your Head Up, And your Stick On The Ice.

  2. #12
    Found juskom95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    10,300

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    24,091
    Thanked 20,730 Times in 8,455 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gambit View Post
    if trump wins, we see the streets in and outside cities get filled with morons

    if trump lose (voter fraud) we ****ed a country because the sloop going will effect only good people
    Yup. No matter who wins, chaos is in the future.
    "Every person’s life is theirs by right. An individual’s life can and must belong only to himself, not to any society or community, or he is then but a slave. No one can deny another person their right to their life, nor seize by force what is produced by someone else, because that is stealing their means to sustain their life. It is treason against mankind to hold a knife to a man’s throat and dictate how he must live his life."



    COFFEE!

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to juskom95 For This Useful Post:

    hawgrider (09-01-2020),Inor (08-30-2020)

  4. #13
    Super Moderator TJC44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    In a better Place
    Posts
    4,808

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    3,177
    Thanked 8,722 Times in 3,588 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gambit View Post
    if trump wins, we see the streets in and outside cities get filled with morons

    if trump lose (voter fraud) we ****ed a country because the sloop going will effect only good people
    And if there is no clear decision by Inauguration Day, the Speaker of the House has the reins. (Pelosi)
    BAH FUCKING HUMBUG!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to TJC44 For This Useful Post:

    juskom95 (08-30-2020)

  6. #14
    Just this guy Inor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Fire land
    Posts
    12,659

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    33,050
    Thanked 34,104 Times in 10,465 Posts
    Honestly, I think the only solution left is to divide the country into several smaller countries. 330 million people, especially when they are as diverse as These United States currently are, is too many to be able to have a safe and peaceful country. If you look around the world, the only countries with large populations and without widespread civil unrest are the countries with a homogeneous population (China, India, etc.). In countries with a diverse population, the max population seems to be somewhere between 50M and 70M to maintain social order. Even the U.K., with about 70M is having problems.

    So, I think we should either divide up into 6-7 smaller countries or kill off all the hippies. I am good with either solution.
    Admin for the most politically correct site on the web. Welcome to the OTP!

    Follow our house build: http://www.mtacres.net/

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Inor For This Useful Post:

    Innkeeper (08-30-2020)

  8. #15
    Found juskom95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    10,300

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    24,091
    Thanked 20,730 Times in 8,455 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TJC44 View Post
    And if there is no clear decision by Inauguration Day, the Speaker of the House has the reins. (Pelosi)
    Part of me thinks that is their goal currently.

    Quote Originally Posted by Inor View Post
    Honestly, I think the only solution left is to divide the country into several smaller countries. 330 million people, especially when they are as diverse as These United States currently are, is too many to be able to have a safe and peaceful country. If you look around the world, the only countries with large populations and without widespread civil unrest are the countries with a homogeneous population (China, India, etc.). In countries with a diverse population, the max population seems to be somewhere between 50M and 70M to maintain social order. Even the U.K., with about 70M is having problems.

    So, I think we should either divide up into 6-7 smaller countries or kill off all the hippies. I am good with either solution.
    Won't ever happen, because the lunatic Left knows their policies don't work without someone to fund them.
    "Every person’s life is theirs by right. An individual’s life can and must belong only to himself, not to any society or community, or he is then but a slave. No one can deny another person their right to their life, nor seize by force what is produced by someone else, because that is stealing their means to sustain their life. It is treason against mankind to hold a knife to a man’s throat and dictate how he must live his life."



    COFFEE!

  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to juskom95 For This Useful Post:

    BucketBack (09-01-2020),Innkeeper (08-30-2020),Inor (08-30-2020),StratBastard (08-30-2020)

  10. #16
    VIP Member! StratBastard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Coburg Oregon
    Posts
    14,727

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    19,619
    Thanked 47,206 Times in 13,446 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by juskom95 View Post
    Part of me thinks that is their goal currently.



    Won't ever happen, because the lunatic Left knows their policies don't work without someone to fund them.
    Exactly. A parasite needs a host, and the conservatives are the most productive segment to loot.
    A.K.A. StratBastard
    "It can't be fixed."
    NRA Member
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFa4g5nQPss

  11. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to StratBastard For This Useful Post:

    BucketBack (09-01-2020),hawgrider (08-30-2020),Innkeeper (08-30-2020),juskom95 (08-30-2020)

  12. #17
    VIP Member! Dwight55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,994

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    6,887
    Thanked 14,266 Times in 4,330 Posts
    I would love to see Pelosi march up with a handful of her "faithful supporters" to take over the oval office . . .

    Just to see the Donald pick her up by her wig and her butt and toss her halfway down the hallway. He would be villified forever . . . but it would darn near be worth it.

    There is no statement anywhere in any of the "official papers" that makes the speaker of the house the president in this scenario. As it stands . . . Donald is president until another is elected.

    Sure hope that doesn't happen in November.

    May God bless,
    Dwight
    If you can breathe, . . . thank God.

    If you can read, . . . thank a teacher.

    If you can read in English, . . . thank a veteran.

    www.dwightsgunleather.com

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Dwight55 For This Useful Post:

    juskom95 (09-01-2020)

  14. #18
    Found juskom95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    10,300

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    24,091
    Thanked 20,730 Times in 8,455 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwight55 View Post
    I would love to see Pelosi march up with a handful of her "faithful supporters" to take over the oval office . . .

    Just to see the Donald pick her up by her wig and her butt and toss her halfway down the hallway. He would be villified forever . . . but it would darn near be worth it.
    She would be doing it with police, LEO and possibly federal LE support. Sadly, there are A LOT of Never Trumpers in the mix, especially at the higher levels.

    There is no statement anywhere in any of the "official papers" that makes the speaker of the house the president in this scenario. As it stands . . . Donald is president until another is elected.

    Sure hope that doesn't happen in November.

    May God bless,
    Dwight
    I think that is going to happen, and I'm convinced it is the real push for massive mail in voting and absentee voting; it will delay the process significantly, and it could even delay it past the January deadline.
    "Every person’s life is theirs by right. An individual’s life can and must belong only to himself, not to any society or community, or he is then but a slave. No one can deny another person their right to their life, nor seize by force what is produced by someone else, because that is stealing their means to sustain their life. It is treason against mankind to hold a knife to a man’s throat and dictate how he must live his life."



    COFFEE!

  15. #19
    VIP Member! BucketBack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Great Lake State
    Posts
    21,965

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    20,042
    Thanked 33,103 Times in 14,729 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    The Presential succession act 1947 does indeed say if president hasn't been selected, the Speaker will act as president until one can be chosen / elected. Either way POTOS and VPOTUS are out of office on 1 / 20 / 21


    One of the most important issues for the stability of any government is a smooth and orderly transition of power. Succession acts were installed by the U.S. government beginning within a few years of the ratification of the Constitution. These acts were set up so that in the event of the untimely death, incapacitation, or ouster of both the President and Vice President, there should be absolute certainty who would become president and in what order
    The order was also revised so that the Speaker of the House came before the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. Truman's main concern was that with the third position of succession set as the Secretary of State, he would be, in effect, the one who named his own successor.
    https://www.thoughtco.com/order-of-p...cession-105434


    3 U.S. Code § 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act for election

    (1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President.






    They won't follow the rules anyway.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/19

    Then can't take office if they don't qualify, not being elected is a dis qualifier then ?
    Keep Your Head Up, And your Stick On The Ice.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BucketBack For This Useful Post:

    hawgrider (09-01-2020),juskom95 (09-01-2020)

  17. #20
    VIP Member! Dwight55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,994

    Ranks Showcase

    Thanks
    6,887
    Thanked 14,266 Times in 4,330 Posts
    Learn something new every day . . . thanks.

    May God bless,
    Dwight
    If you can breathe, . . . thank God.

    If you can read, . . . thank a teacher.

    If you can read in English, . . . thank a veteran.

    www.dwightsgunleather.com

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •